Materials Science

Correctional Dinnerware Materials: What’s the Difference?

Download Article

Evolution of the Tray: It’s What’s on the Inside That Counts

While the shapes of correctional trays haven't changed much in 20 years, the materials have undergone a massive evolution. Today’s dinnerware is engineered to answer critical security questions: Can it be sharpened into a weapon? What happens if it’s melted? How long will it last in a high-heat dishwasher?


1. Polycarbonate

Best For: ICE facilities or settings requiring a "cafeteria" look rather than an institutional one.

  • Pros: Extremely strong, polished appearance, high scratch resistance.
  • Cons: High price; develops "crazing" (hairline fractures) over time; High Security Risk: Shatters into shards that can be sharpened into razor-edged weapons.

2. Co-Polymer

Best For: The standard choice for typical correctional institutions.

  • Pros: Affordable (half the price of polycarbonate); high elasticity prevents shattering; difficult to weaponize because edges "roll" rather than sharpen.
  • Cons: Softer surface scratches and stains more easily; requires more frequent replacement to maintain aesthetics.

3. Insulated Trays (Co-Polymer with Foam)

Best For: Maintaining food temperatures without heated carts.

These use a co-polymer shell injected with polyurethane foam. Modern versions use hydrophobic foam to prevent the tray from becoming water-logged and unsanitary if the shell is breached.

4. High Temperature (Radel-R & Alternatives)

Best For: Cook/chill operations that re-thermalize food in the tray (250°F to 350°F).

  • Pros: Extreme heat and impact resistance; very durable.
  • Cons: Very expensive (4x to 8x the cost of co-poly). Only necessary if your trays exceed 212°F.

5. Silicone Rubber

Best For: Max-security, suicide watch, or mental health wards using cook/chill.

  • Pros: Virtually impossible to weaponize; withstands 400°F+; will not crack or chip.
  • Cons: Expensive; "floppy" and heavy; less durable than rigid plastics.

6. Thermoplastic Elastomer (TPE)

Best For: Maximum security where weapon-making is the primary concern, but high heat is NOT required.

  • Pros: 20% lower cost than silicone; unbreakable and safe.
  • Cons: Not suitable for temperatures over 212°F; prone to bending when loaded with hot food.

7. MaxFlex™ Blend

Best For: Facilities seeking the ultimate balance of safety and durability.

This is the newest material on the market—a specialized blend that optimizes hardness and flexibility.

  • Safety: It tears rather than fractures. It cannot be sharpened into a point, and it does not harden when melted and cooled.
  • Durability: Nearly double the hardness of other flexible trays, ensuring it holds its shape while remaining non-breakable.

Which is Best for Your Facility?

The right choice depends on your specific priorities: Safety, Cost, Durability, or Temperature. We recommend testing samples of multiple materials in your own dishwasher and housing units before committing to a full fleet.

Want to see the difference in person? Contact JonesZylon for a sample kit of our Co-Poly and MaxFlex™ materials.

Need Help?